CryptoHelper

ResearchGuidesReviews

Editorial Methodology

How CryptoHelper evaluates information, audits platforms, and maintains editorial independence.
Last Updated: Sep 28, 2026

1. Source Selection & Claims Verification

All technical claims are verified against primary sources, including on-chain data, open-source repositories, and published cryptographic audits. We do not accept marketing claims without independent verification.

2. Review Scoring System

Our reviews are strictly quantitative where possible. Platforms are scored across five core dimensions:
  • Security: Custody architecture, cold storage ratio, and smart contract audits.
  • Payments: Processing times, withdrawal limits, and fee structures.
  • User Experience: Interface clarity, mobile accessibility, and onboarding friction.
  • Selection: Breadth and depth of supported assets and markets.
  • Support: Response times, dispute resolution, and transparency.

3. Independence & Commercial Separation

CryptoHelper operates a strict separation between editorial content and commercial partnerships. While we may earn affiliate commissions (as disclosed in our Affiliate Policy), these relationships do not influence our platform ratings, security audits, or research conclusions.